During the past few months we have had more than just a
handful of clients asking us about this so-called currency reset that has been
discussed in various forums recently. And of course we have received a
large number of phone calls from people asking about banking in other
jurisdictions (away from their home country), how to secure their 401K or
pension funds from possible government asset grabs, and related kinds of
concerns. But before anyone jumps to the conclusion that all this is
simple conspiracy quackery, former US Congressman Ron Paul recently
participated in a few public interviews this year (2015) whereby he discussed
his belief that a currency crisis is coming to the United States. While
there have been a large number of things posted on so-called conspiracy sites,
we have to believe that when someone such as Dr. Ron Paul basically says that
something wicked this way comes, you have to sit up and take notice.
After all, they said that Ross Perot was off his mind when he warned about what
would happen to US manufacturing and the resultant loss of American jobs if
NAFTA and other similar trade agreements were put into place, and to be honest,
the man was eventually vindicated (although even he did not fathom the loss of
manufacturing not to Mexico alone, but of course to China). Now the new
item on the agenda is the TPP or Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement that has
not even been fully made public due to the so-called sensitive nature of it
(interpret this as the general public is too dumb to know what is says, and
it's none of their business anyway, or so would seem to be the US Government's
attitude about it).
In fact, a few people that actually did read it claim
if the American people knew what was in the document, there would be open
revolt in the morning. So, the point is, in a so-called free democratic
open society, if the learned and esteemed politicians are willing to conduct
themselves in such a manner regarding a free trade agreement – what else are
they prepared and willing to do regarding other issues? Never the less
and getting back to the fate of the US Dollar, such a crisis would basically
result in the rejection of the US Dollar both for trade internationally and a
store of value for central bank reserves world-wide as well. So, you can
call it by whatever moniker or term you may wish, but the idea that there will
be some kind of future crisis effecting or involving the US Dollar is not so far-fetched.
Something has to give and changes are certainly in motion with respect to the
pecking order of nations (in terms of economic power) and subsequent issues
pertaining to trade settlement as well (and thus what currencies will become
important, and what currencies will fall by the wayside).
What is the basis for this assumption and predictions about
the long term future of the US Dollar (and other currencies as well)?
Some people will refer back to August 1971 as the starting point when then
former US President Nixon took the US Dollar off the gold standard and closed
off the gold convertibility of the US Dollar to foreign central banks.
And it certainly is true that date might be considered to be the start of the
backing of the US Dollar by oil, or better said an agreement that was
constructed so that ALL oil sales would be conducted in US Dollars, thus
creating a demand for that currency for commodity trade settlement. Such
an agreement meant that all foreign governments (and any private businesses
involved in oil or petroleum transactions) needed to keep a reserve of US
Dollars to purchase oil. This of course created a demand for US Dollars
that very much so gave support and value for the USD use in global commerce
(remember basic supply and demand economics, and currencies can be considered a
commodity as well subject to supply and demand functions). In essence the
free floating currency (and variable exchange rate) system we have today was
born out this, but it has left the door wide open to abuse by politicians and
financial participants (Central Banks) that decided to print money with
reckless abandon when they so desired to do so.
Conservative columnist David J. Frum summed up the inherent problems with a free floating (and untethered to gold or silver) currency unit this way: The modern currency float has its problems. There is no magical monetary cure, monetary policy is a policy area almost uniquely crowded with trade-offs and lesser evils. If you want a classical gold standard, you get chronic deflation punctuated by depressions, as the U.S. did between 1873 and 1934. If you want a regime of managed currencies tethered to gold, you get regulations and controls, as the U.S. got from 1934 through 1971. If you let the currency float, you get chronic inflation punctuated by bubbles, the American lot since 1971. System 1 is incompatible with democracy, because voters won’t accept the pain inherent in a gold standard. System 2 is incompatible with the free market economics I favor.
Conservative columnist David J. Frum summed up the inherent problems with a free floating (and untethered to gold or silver) currency unit this way: The modern currency float has its problems. There is no magical monetary cure, monetary policy is a policy area almost uniquely crowded with trade-offs and lesser evils. If you want a classical gold standard, you get chronic deflation punctuated by depressions, as the U.S. did between 1873 and 1934. If you want a regime of managed currencies tethered to gold, you get regulations and controls, as the U.S. got from 1934 through 1971. If you let the currency float, you get chronic inflation punctuated by bubbles, the American lot since 1971. System 1 is incompatible with democracy, because voters won’t accept the pain inherent in a gold standard. System 2 is incompatible with the free market economics I favor.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
No dudes en expresar tu opinion o solicitar cualquier ayuda y/o sugerencias las cuales enriquecerán nuestro blog